Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems and Media Remain Silent About WHO's Change on Lockdowns
Townhall.com ^ | October 10, 2020 | Brad Slager

Posted on 10/12/2020 5:07:58 AM PDT by Kaslin

You would expect that after months of insistence that we, as a COVID-afflicted nation, adhere to the words of medical experts in general and specifically the guidance from the World Health Organization, there would be more than scant coverage of the latest announcement from WHO. Their spokesman, Dr. David Nabarro, has come forward to make a stern announcement to the leaders of the nations across the globe to back away from the practice of locking down our societies.

Nabarro was rather direct in telling the politicians to stop using the lockdown method as a means to control the pandemic within their nations. “Lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer. We in the World Health Organisation do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus.’’

The closing of our society in numerous areas has become a point of contention in many states, becoming a political factor in a time when many politicians have been seen using the pandemic as means of flexing some of their unelected political muscle. Just in Michigan we are seeing a state Supreme Court striking down the numerous executive orders Governor Gretchen Whitmer has imposed on her citizens. The very fact that she has instituted over 160 of these orders is a telling statistic.

The glaring aspect of this recent announcement is that the WHO has been regarded as the gold standard in medical advice dispensed to address the global outbreak. WHO has been used as cudgel with President Trump, who has correctly noted how that organization has been showing a high level of fealty towards the communist Chinese leadership – a glaring issue considering ground-zero for the outbreak was in Wuhan – and that they have also been contradictory at times in its advice. Case in point is WHO now turning 180 degree with their lockdown advice. 

It has to be regarded as rather revealing how the politicians and the press members who had relied so heavily on the words of WHO doctors are now completely silent as they contradict the desire of these same players to keep us in a state of social and economic paralysis. Just look at the ever-shifting standards that were forwarded in order for us to reopen the country. First we needed a two-week down time to halt the spread, then that became a need to stay quarantined until the infection curve was flattened. Next was the call to blunt the second wave of infections.

Each one of these professed thresholds was met with scientific data, and each time the pandemic goalposts were moved. Next the call came for the need to have a vaccine, and when it was announced that a few could be soon arriving the "experts’’ have called for those to be submitted to lengthy testing and trials before we can open our doors once again. What is apparent is the desire by many leaders and news delivery agents to keep us under control.

The unintended reality that gets revealed is that those shrill voices calling for us to adhere to the sacrosanct words of the medical experts are now in a position of opposition to those same physicians. Look at the reaction to President Trump’s positive test and how he quickly returned to work. The media scorched his personal care physicians, they began calling doctors who cleared him as "liars" who cannot be trusted, and have even gone to the lengths of saying a major medical facility should be defunded, all over political hackery on their part. 

After months of insistence that doctors be listened to, suddenly in October, medical experts are now viewed suspiciously and should be ignored. Little surprise then in this feverishly reactive time that the WHO recommendation to suspend lockdowns is also roundly ignored.

It became deeply ironic that the people who were barking the most about the administration and conservatives politicizing the pandemic are those same who now reveal themselves to be driven more by politics than the advice of medical experts. If only there was a vaccine for their TDS affliction.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: coronavirus; who
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: cuban leaf

You know who’s been pretty damned silent about this...

Dr. Fauci

And he isn’t silent about much.


21 posted on 10/12/2020 9:04:15 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

So, the boy who cried wolf is suddenly speechless?


22 posted on 10/12/2020 9:05:02 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

No they just lost their expert status. Only those who toe the line are considered experts.


23 posted on 10/12/2020 9:38:43 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’ll bet there’s quite a debate going on at Google over this today. After all, if WHO didn’t support something you wrote, Google has been censoring you.

Will Cuomo, Newsom, and DeBlasio still show up on searches now?


24 posted on 10/12/2020 10:30:02 AM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

” ...If only there was a vaccine for their TDS affliction.”


LOL!


25 posted on 10/12/2020 11:58:20 AM PDT by Synthesist (Best wishes to Trump, a speedy and full recovery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Eight months after lockdowns started, they haven’t ended yet, and now W.H.O. says they don’t work. Why did the communist party of China give them permission to say this now?


26 posted on 10/12/2020 4:19:22 PM PDT by webheart (Coronavirus, I give up. Come get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Norseman

Newsom has said that he can let the lockdowns end as long as there are “targeted investments”. I can’t figure out what exactly he means but it sounds a lot like “bribes”.


27 posted on 10/12/2020 4:33:42 PM PDT by webheart (Coronavirus, I give up. Come get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They are part of this. Imagine that.


28 posted on 10/13/2020 12:05:08 AM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson