Posted on 10/09/2020 8:21:41 AM PDT by Red Badger
Thought I don’t do distance practice any longer, the 300 blackout gives a shooter a wide range of cartridge options, from 110 gr varmigedden to 220 gr subsonic hammer heads, all from the AR 15 platform with just a barrel change. Easily suppressed, too. With any AR lower you can just put together a 30 cal upper.
False they looked at a product that is not consistent with other pistol braces. Specifically it has a adjustable pull length greater than 13’5” , a total length over 26’5” and is adjustable without disassembly of the device. Qs product is a blatant disregard to the limits set for pistol braces and they got burned for it. This is also the same company that has been skirting the laws with suppressors by adding existing serial numbers to new tubes and claiming they are an existing licenced item also a huge no no. The ATF was and is specific about what is different than other brace products the Pearl cluchers are out in force but the simple fact is this company has a history of trying to push the envelope with the ATF and yup they got burned for it.
Sadly, we all get burned for their perfidy. The release device under the brace tube makes using the brace as a brace, ‘painful’. They brace was added as an adjustable stock, not a brace. We all now get the consequences of this Q company trickery.
ATF should be a convenience store, not a Federal Agency. If they are against something, I am probably for it.
Well, now it looks like enough people (probably including #1 son) complained and the big boss heard...Trump is having the new batphucker policy looked at (which means that it is dead if he wins).
And the courts have distorted it, example seat belts, They passed the seat belt laws. But under Ex Post Facto these laws could only be required for all new vehicles being produced after it was passed. Vehicles that were already sold, owned, produced, could not be required to retrofit seatbelts. And tickets cannot be written for not wearing seatbelts in a vehicle that was not required to have seatbelts because it was produced before the law was passed.
It is still this way with seatbelts and it is the constitutional way because Ex Post Facto applies and is observed. It is already this way with many firearms and parts and has been for years now. Based on Ex Post Facto, they can only restrict future manufacturing, imports, or sales. Not those already sold or owned legally. “Pre-ban” is a very common term with firearms and parts because based on Ex Post Facto pre-ban are still legal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.