To: avg_freeper
I though the prosecutor’s office dismantled and rebuilt her handgun.
2 posted on
10/06/2020 3:42:37 PM PDT by
noexcuses
To: noexcuses
Yea, they’re trying to do a little quick change op.....won’t work
To: noexcuses
Yes, and from that they were charged. In our third world communist banana republic the victims will be accused of their perpetrator's crime.
6 posted on
10/06/2020 3:48:58 PM PDT by
avg_freeper
(Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
To: noexcuses
Exactly. It was in a non-firing configuration (firing pin in backwards, apparently) so it could be used as a courtroom prop. The DA apparently ordered the evidence people to rebuild it in a firing configuration.
16 posted on
10/06/2020 3:58:56 PM PDT by
ProtectOurFreedom
("And oft conducted by historic truth, We tread the long extent of backward timef)
To: noexcuses
Ironic isn’t it.
They are going to charge her
for inadvertently disabling
her pistol.
I read she had disassembled it
to clean it and reassembled
it with a spring in backward
rendering the pistol inoperable.
( Though DemCommies hated guns /-)
Well,,, maybe just capitalist’s guns
38 posted on
10/07/2020 7:54:06 AM PDT by
cuz1961
(USCGR Veteran 10/17/78 to 11/24/84)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson