Replies

You mean like your post?

Just because YOU make up stats on the fly does not automatically mean everyone else does it.

You need to turn off the idiot tube, and do some real research for once in your life.

Here I will show you the quote since you think I am making this up.

“In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus,”

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

In Florida nearly 100% of the new tests are positive.

https://www.newsmax.com/us/coronavirus-covid-florida/2020/07/14/id/977213/

Did you hear about some of the people (Tennessee and two other States) that went to hospitals to get tested.. They signed in but never got tested. This is because the hospital was too busy. They went home and week or so later received a call from the hospital saying they tested positive. This is even though they never tested.

I have even heard other people saying they received a call from hospitals about their deceased family member from 6 months earlier testing positive for Covid 19.

Point being there is a lot of false claims by hospitals to cash in on anyone that tests positive. On average hospitals received a bounty of 52k per positive case. Now you know why all the false positive cases. There is a financial incentive.

Now compare it here to Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo is the largest city in the world and closer geographically to Wuhan, China. Yet they have a death toll of about 1,600. Compare that to New York City that has 32,813 deaths. Tokyo has a bigger population than New York City and people are living on top of each other. How do you explain that?

Answer: There is no financial incentive in Japan like there is here in the USA.

In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus,”

Well at least I am not dishonest. You either are intentionally lying or do not understand the meaning of the term false positive. If you actually were to understand Baysian Statistics and the actual testing methodology, you would find that a false (+) is all but impossible with a PCR. It is a highly specific test and the genetic sequence of the virus is either there or it is not.

Of course this is not to be confused with sensitivity which is something entirely different. The number of reproductive cycles may be artificially high and that is a valid statement that perhaps we are uncovering insignificant viral loads, but that does not make the test falsely (+). It is, in fact a positive test from a highly specific technique.

Thank you for showing me the quote and revealing that you do not understand what is actually said. Oh -- and my real research -- it does not come from the idiot tube, it comes from those four years of medical school, 5 years of postdoctoral work and 20 years of practice.

I will await your apology and we shall see If you are able to recognize your mistakes, however, I hold little hope as I have seen the tenor of your other posts.