Replies

"Infrared burst from ground stress "

YES!

That -- and the Freund paper you linked to -- make excellent sense as a likely explanation of hot surface spots associated with a fault zone.

IF "DEW energy came from Space and heated the deep earth" -- why is there no evidence of spots of burned vegetation, etc. on the surface?

As for dutchsinse.com -- if you think you've discovered enemies with "Directed Energy Weapons" (DEW) -- and are looking for a juicy conspiracy theory -- you'll blame anything new on a that "conspiracy" -- rather than on scientific evidence.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Same thing happened in OKC -- including a wacko theory that the Murrah Building damage was caused by a "plasma beam from space".

'Way too many folks (including many FReepers) would rather have a titillating, juicy "Conspiracy" to blather about -- rather than to examine ALL the evidence and the forces of (natural) physics involved...

[Been there; wrote the (chapter of) the book...] (See my FRProfile...)

TXnMA

Fine but what’s your explanation for the beam appearing in the satellite image? I didn’t double check this one. But I went to COD.edu (college of dupage) weather site and saw the beam image myself when Dutchsinse spotted the California beam.

Now to be fair, two beams doesn’t account for all the fires on the west coast. Dutchsinse’s theory that hot spots form due to seismic activity may account for the majority of them.

But if DEW weapons are being used to add even a small amount of chaos, then it’s something to look into. Find the perps and make sure they can never do it again.

"DEW energy came from Space and heated the deep earth" -- why is there no evidence of spots of burned vegetation, etc. on the surface?"

As Lt. Col. Bearden explained back in the early 70's, the hot or cold spot materializes where two beams cross. The satellite image only shows what looks like one beam, so where is the other beam is one of the unanswered questions. Maybe it's two beams in close proximity that don't cross until the target.

Yep, need some physics lessons here...DEW weapons by all accounts have not been deployed in orbit yet, and assuming they have done so in secret, then they barely have enough power to destroy/damage an ICBM at the top of it’s arc. (Enough power to penetrate thin aluminum). Orbital lasers/particle beams directed at the earth’s surface wouldn’t have enough power to warm up a burrito, let alone 1100 degrees or enough power to start a fire.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/27039/budget-docs-show-pentagon-aims-to-loft-particle-beam-anti-missile-weapon-into-space-in-four-years

https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2019/03/pentagon-wants-test-space-based-weapon-2023/155581/

https://www.nrl.navy.mil/ppd/atmo-prop

Only “hotspots” related to the New Madrid fault zone would be magma plumes:
https://www.livescience.com/39658-new-north-america-hotspot-found.html