Posted on 10/01/2020 12:18:41 PM PDT by Kaslin
There is a massive story about President Trump’s tax returns. It’s that someone committed a federal crime — or at the very least violated one of the basic principles of federal tax law and betrayed their professional duty — by providing an American citizen’s tax returns to journalists.
That’s not the story The New York Times wanted to tell — not least because they were passive participants in that crime or ethical breach.
The story the Times wanted to tell is the lie that the liberal media have been telling for four years now: massive, undisclosed ties to Russia, secret payoffs, and backroom deals. You can almost read the disappointment between the lines as The New York Times is forced to admit that it was all a heap of lies. Even with illicit access to confidential documents — we can’t honestly know what it is The New York Times has, let alone whether it’s accurate or authentic, because they aren’t allowing any independent review — the Times came up with yet another nothingburger.
The Times report debunks each of the conspiracy theories about Trump’s taxes, one after another. Shady Michael Cohen payoffs? Nope, “the materials obtained by The Times did not include any itemized payments to Mr. Cohen.” Russia? Nope, “nor do [President Trump’s confidential tax documents] reveal any previously unreported connections to Russia.”
It gets worse for the Times. Whatever information the outlet has also proves, by its own admission, that President Trump was telling the truth all along about why he hasn’t released his returns of his own accord. There’s an ongoing audit over tens of millions of dollars of deductions he claimed, which is still being disputed. That dispute belongs in private, in the tax courts, not before the public where every shred of information would immediately become a politicized mess. If he loses in the audit, the president will pay the money in question and any attendant penalties. That’s how taxes work. It’s also exactly what the president has said all along, even as the liberal media mocked him over it.
Disappointed that they didn’t get to write the story they wanted to — a thrilling spy novel with Russians and salacious sex stories — the Times reporters invented a new one: President Trump only paid $750 in federal income tax in certain years.
That should be a huge story, shouldn’t it? Maybe it would be, if President Trump hadn’t explicitly said that was the case four years ago on national television. Really, millions of people watched! Hillary Clinton was there, right on stage with him. Even The New York Times reported on it.
President Trump’s businesses suffered losses. He wrote them off, allowing him to use provisions in the tax code to avoid some taxes on the revenue those businesses later earned. No one cared then and no one cares now, because it simply isn’t a big story. Writing off losses to offset earnings is not a crime. It’s how taxes work.
More importantly, the implication that President Trump somehow does not pay taxes is patently false. The Trump Organization told the Times exactly that.
Over the past decade, President Trump has paid tens of millions of dollars in personal taxes to the federal government, including paying millions in personal taxes since announcing his candidacy. His companies have paid more than $100 million over the same time in corporate tax, sales tax, employment tax, and property tax.
Donald Trump’s businesses are often high-risk endeavors that involve spending millions of dollars on properties that in some cases become essentially worthless. When that happens, like any responsible businessman, he records the legitimate losses from nonfunctional properties that produce zero jobs and taxes to the communities in which they are located and uses the difference to invest in properties that are productive and do provide jobs.
Again, this is not a bombshell; it’s just how taxes work. By virtue of how much money his businesses have made, the president has paid untold millions of dollars in taxes. Billionaires — liberal and conservative — as well as many public companies and their CEOs, often pay little federal tax in any given year. President Trump is different in only one respect: unlike most billionaires, he signed tax reforms that reduced the number of deductions available to wealthy people in order to allow middle-income Americans to enjoy lower income tax rates. That’s a story the Times should write about some time, instead of violating tax privacy to chase down wild conspiracy theories.
They’ve already moved on from it, it was all about knocking Trump off-balance Tuesday night.
This is an important point. When the Podesta and DNC emails were published, the MSM only wanted to talk about how awful the hack of private emails was, not about the substance of what any of the emails said.
Hope Trumps administration finds out who leaked them and put their as... in jail.
Excellent, informative piece...
The press's guiding principle is 'what works best for democrats'...It's why people trust Used Car Salespeople MORE than 'journalists ...
By the way, does anyone know what the New York Times paid in income taxes last year?
They did exactly what Julian Assange did.
I won’t read NYT articles so some one will have to tell me if they reported how much Trump donated to charity.
It has long been known how little Democraps donate to charity with no shame.
So, I doubt that the NYT would think it worthy of print to tell how much DJT donates to charity.
Chris Wallace took the bait and went with the NYC story without looking into the facts.
All the NY Times proved to me was that 1) Americans have ZERO expectation of privacy from the their government, and 2) that corrupt bureaucracies at all levels are full of partisan hacks who will break the law if politics demands it.
And that is even though the NYT could say anything it wanted like Harry Reid did in 2012.
Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.
I don’t think Wall@ss took any bait.
I think he WILLINGLY ran with FAKE news, truth be d3mned.
Evil!!
Did NYSlimes happen to say who broke the law and leaked POTUS’ tax info??
THAT’S the REAL story, here.
Who at IRS leaked it, and who did they first leak it to?
It should be fairly easy to determine who had access to the pres’s tax information. The pres’s tax filing is given special handling. It doesn’t go into the ordinary pool of returns where yours and mine go.
Only a few had access. It should not be hard. Why isn’t there any will to go after that person?
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated."
Shouldn't we have some statutory muscle to back this up? How the hell did someone get their hands on President Trumps tax returns? IT IS NOBODY'S BUSINESS, least of all the New York Times. There should be a lawsuit.
Turnabout is fair play. I hope someone starts "doxying" liberals working for the New York Times and exposing their tax returns and papers. That might give them pause to ponder.
You don’t really think they would tell, don’t you? They want to destroy this president
I think the lawsuit should be based on the fact that the “tax information” was false, libelous, and defamatory and the fact that the “tax information” was published with malicious disregard for the truth.
Such a lawsuit would permit “discovery”, to learn exactly what documents the NYT has.
And that will allow the WH to identify the rat and start him on his path to the big house...
Yeah....I should’ve added my /sarc tag.
Trump himself may have released them thru...”intermediaries” providing a master troll effort on the elections. Wait for the build up....the cries of tax fraud fill the air...slip the records and boom....oh nothing really there....”oh don’t we feel foolish, Trump has outwitted us again.”
I would love it if Trump would just hint that it was him. It would accomplish 2 things....if it was Trump then it puts everyone on the Dem’s side on guard and it also scuttles the Trump was a tax fraud notion once and for all. If it wasn’t him then it might just flush out who in fact did give the tax stuff to the Times as the Times would be forced to clear itself of being snookered by Trump.
Serious Question. If these documents were stolen, wouldn’t the NYT’s be an accessory to a crime?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.