Posted on 09/30/2020 12:03:30 PM PDT by RandFan
Kyle Rittenhouse’s lawyer is set to sue the Biden campaign, after they implied that the 17-year-old was a white supremacist in a political advert.
More...
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalfile.com ...
you apparently have reached yours based on rumor and innuendo. Be grateful people aren’t doing that to you.
Amen.
Locally we have a vegetable stand run by libs with a BLM placard out and signs for various local Demonrats.
NO one has burned their stand down. Although I feel like it every day when I pass there. I notice he took down his “End these Endless Wars” sign down when the President procured peace.
“Wood is more interested in advancing his fortunes rather than defending his client.”
You mean like all lawyers?
“...On the other hand, this might wake up a lot of Biden supporters for the election.“
...That’s quite a stretch. How do you figure?
“Wood is more interested in advancing his fortunes rather than defending his client.”
A good lawyer can do both at the same time, in fact, they should. Now if the good lawyers you are quoting want to work for free, that’s great, but they won’t be lawyering for very long unless they are filthy rich and do it as a hobby. Hope your lawyer friends include Benjamin Crump in their criticism.
That is EXACTLY what these lawyers find success in...
... And they will win !
That's exactly what he did.
Two lawyers, Robert Barnes and Lin Wood are in a pissing contest over the Covington kids. Wood represents Sandmann and Barnes represents some other Covington kids, but not including Sandmann. Right now, I support Barnes account. If I see evidence that causes me take the other side, I will. Haven’t seen it yet.
As for Rittenhouse: where is the money. Why is he still in Jail in Illinois? Why are prominent attorneys in Wisconsin and Illinois declining to join the Rittenhouse legal team. The kid really needs a good criminal attorney who knows both states. Wood is neither.
yes, he was.
Sounds like a case, 17 years old = very, very bad. I guess libs never learn.
Chris Wallace implied that as well. By stating there were acts of white supremacists in Kenosha
Did he actually mention Rittenhouse by name? If not, it's going to be harder to prove in court. Kyle Rittenhouse was not the only guy in Kenosha that night.
Nope. He just said Kenosha. You’re right.
he did say Kenosha...which in itself was shocking to me.
months of riots nightly carried out by far-left Dems/BLM/Antifa - majority white - and Wallace demanded Trump disavow white supremacy, but didn’t define the rioters as far-left or Marxist, or even as “rioters”, did he? nor did he ask Biden to disavow...only to say if he’d phoned Dem officials.
It highlights the situation in the big media, they spin it as a 2nd Amendment, white supremacist run amok, and their echo chamber starts spewing that all of America will be like this if Trump wins.
I said might, not would.
Thank you for the update/links
Much appreciated.
My pleasure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.