I’m not opposed to vaccines, but this one is being rushed.
Never install the x.0 version of software.
Never buy a car in its first production year.
In other words: Never be on the bleeding edge of technology.
Precisely.
I always get the second or third year of a new Accord design.
I’m also extremely healthy at 45, so cost/benefit doesn’t necessitate a vaccine for me.
I’m sure others will apply cost/benefit analysis.
DNA editing vaccines are more akin to loading software that has been infected with malware. We the consumer, only know what It says on the software packagIng. Unfortunately the malware may can wreak any havoc it has been designed to do, including staying dormant for years or decades before springing to life. It is a game changer that gives our population control obsessed leftist elites the power to do things like reduce longevity to 70 years, reduce fertility, Etc.
Never install the x.0 version of software.
Never buy a car in its first production year.
In other words: Never be on the bleeding edge of technology.
Be not the first by whom the new are tried,is a prudent rule depending on your evaluation of the circumstances.
Nor yet the last to lay the old aside. - Alexander PopeDesperate ills are by desperate measures cured. Or not at all. - ShakespeareWhat it really boils down to is your estimate of the probability of harm from the virus compared to the probability of harm from the vaccine and the likelihood that the vaccine will prevent harm from the virus.If you’re reasonably certain it’s safe, there’s little to recommend avoiding it if it is even 50% likely to prevent harm. If you’re certain it’s safe, it doesn’t take much expectation of benefit at all to make it acceptable.
If you’re old and in poor health, and if the virus is gonna be around indefinitely, you might as well take the vaccine, pretty much. IMHO.
You are precisely correct.