You claimed that Collins and Murkowski would vote against her for supposed “lack of judicial experience” after being a judge for 14 years when Kagan who they supported had zero.
“You claimed that Collins and Murkowski would vote against her for supposed “lack of judicial experience” after being a judge for 14 years when Kagan who they supported had zero.”
Lack of FEDERAL judicial experience. They could use that as an EXCUSE to vote NAY on her nomination. Think about it: Murkowski voted NAY on Kavanaugh because she feared how he might rule on Roe v. Wade, and her Nay vote had nothing to do with the scandalous allegations of “gang rape” and the other absurdities; Collins voted AYE on Kavanaugh, but reluctantly. But Collins was not up for re-election during the Kavanaugh vote, but she IS up for re-election on the Barrett vote (or whomever Trump would have nominated); and because Collins has a very good chance of losing her re-election race she would more than likely cast a confirmation vote AGAINST a nominee who might oppose Roe v. Wade.