Good point. This article is likely bogus.
I’ve never known The Federalist to submit bogus articles. Everything these two journalists have ever written regarding the Russian collision hoax crime, has been proven correct. The article is based upon court filings.
Good point. This article is likely bogus.
************************************
It’s not bogus. It’s a code word. Although, we don’t know what the insurance means.
I think the biggest take away is that this is now being leaked. Durham and Barr have kept this buttoned up tight, there have been almost no leaks about what they were doing. Investigations have to be sealed until they are over, and then they become public knowledge.
If they are leaking, it’s done. If we ever are going to see indictments. the time is now.
This article is likely bogus.
.One text, dated Jan. 10, 2017, read: “we all went and purchased professional liability insurance.” Other texts discussed the rules for reimbursement of that insurance.