Speaking of erroneous BS. Earlier this evening some Freeper posted without any source whatsoever, that the Judge that is said to be at the top of the Presidents list is a believer and practitioner of Speaking in Tongues.
The Freeper intimated that this will sink Barret’s nomination. When challenged by me for an authoritative source for the post I got crickets.
There are a good many people that oppose Trumps likely nominee for a myriad of reasons. Many of those reasons appear to be very dubious.
RE: Speaking of erroneous BS. Earlier this evening some Freeper posted without any source whatsoever, that the Judge that is said to be at the top of the Presidents list is a believer and practitioner of Speaking in Tongues.
Judge Barrett has already been vetted, critiqued, scrutinized, and attacked by the Democrats during her nomination to the Seventh Circuit.
If this and her devout Catholicism were an issue, she would not have been confirmed for what is a judgeship just one notch below the Supreme Court.
I don’t think this will be an issue at all, otherwise they would have used it to derail her nomination then.
The GOP will spend the last 5 weeks of the campaign talking about religion.
Trainwreck.
I am more in favor of the Judge from Florida. It is more for blatant political reasons over ACB...I have nothing against ACB, but being a deist —I am always a little wary of religious organizations anyway. That is me and no reflection what so ever on the qualifications any potential Scotus nominee.