Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump to Make Supreme Court Nomination Friday or Saturday. President has five women under consideration to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Wall Street Journal ^ | September 21, 2020 | Natalie Andrews

Posted on 09/21/2020 6:18:49 AM PDT by karpov

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-253 next last
To: skr

Your points are good. Every potential nominee will need to get their families to a safe place. It is also true they will have decide if they are willing to endure the Kavanaugh treatment.


141 posted on 09/21/2020 9:11:00 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince

Could be Grant...? Could be Barrett...?

I worry about this new one Lagoa from Florida...seems to be somewhat favorable to DNC arms like WaPo, and is being pushed by Little Marco...

Makes me pause...


142 posted on 09/21/2020 9:11:36 AM PDT by MCEscherHammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente
My thoughts as well. I see him going with the Latina out of Florida and use Barrett to replace Thomas who is nearing retirement. But I kinda like the idea of Britt Grant. Get a rock solid 2d Amendment Conservative on now. To be honest, 2d Amendment may be more important at this moment in time and SCOTUS has a number of 2d Amendment cases working up through the courts.
143 posted on 09/21/2020 9:14:12 AM PDT by OldGoatCPO (No Caitiff Choir of Angles will sing for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: MCEscherHammer

Lagoa is a blank slate from what I can tell. Grant has a real record and is also counter culture (MSM culture). She won’t bend in the end (as best as I can tell). The others, to me, no clue. I don’t see a record.


144 posted on 09/21/2020 9:18:55 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

I would use Janice Brown as the nuclear option if I had to make a recess appointment. If she is willing, her appointment would be valid for two years until the next Congress is seated in 2022. Just prior to 2022, can you see the Dems trying to force the first black woman off the court. At 70, Brown has no other way to get on the court so she may be willing to take a recess appointment that would cement her place in Judicial history.


145 posted on 09/21/2020 9:22:12 AM PDT by OldGoatCPO (No Caitiff Choir of Angles will sing for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

Justice Ginsberg body is lying in state at the Supreme Court on Wednesday and Thursday. I think that’s why President is delaying until Friday and Saturday.

Maybe also they need time to get the nominee some time to get her family sequestered and safe and make arrangement for their security. They are going to need it.


146 posted on 09/21/2020 9:22:24 AM PDT by JustaCowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

This is EXACTLY the type of person who the court needs. I didn’t look into the men because Trump said it would be a woman but I want to make sure Trump gives her a fair look and not just have her be on the list as a signal. She is precisely what SCOTUS needs right now. It’s bold but they already voted for her within the last few years (52 votes). I think the 52 would have to justify NOT voting for her this time which I don’t think they can do while holding on to the Trump base.


147 posted on 09/21/2020 9:24:11 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

She got 2 black children from Haiti....A lot of shenanigans go on in Haiti I’d bet. Is every I dotted and every T crossed? We don’t need someone compromised who would do ANYTHING to keep the secret. Already got one of those. Britt Grant needs a second, third and a fourth look.


148 posted on 09/21/2020 9:26:04 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy
I do not think a female nominee will face Kavanaugh treatment. I say this because the optics are bad and some pundits see the Senate as 50/50 in the polls. I do not think the Dems care about the White House, they want the House and Senate. Impeachment would be a done deal.

Go after a judge that every suburban soccer mom can relate to and kiss the Senate goodbye. The Dems are in a damned if you do damned if you don’t time lock. The question is which course causes the most damage long term?

149 posted on 09/21/2020 9:30:13 AM PDT by OldGoatCPO (No Caitiff Choir of Angles will sing for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: karpov

If he’s smart, he would nominate a Conservative, Black woman. Other than her assumed position on abortion, the Dems would have a really hard time pushing back on her.

Plus, how hysterical would it be if Trump/the GOP were the first party to put a black female on the court?


150 posted on 09/21/2020 9:30:40 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince
Why would it be all about LBGT

Because they're Democrats. Of course they could always invent a sex assault victim too. And it's not just the bathrooms, Grant actually made some positive comment about heterosexual marriage, so they're bound to call her a bigot.

Trump has a lot of courage but I suspect at this time he wants to maximize the chances of approval. :(

151 posted on 09/21/2020 9:30:44 AM PDT by Buttons12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Thanks for the info! Yeah, I thought Yom Kippur was due soon.


152 posted on 09/21/2020 9:34:05 AM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: OldGoatCPO

I do not think a female nominee will face Kavanaugh treatment.”

That part is probably true but they will try to scare the hell out of women if it’s Barrett. The coat hanger crap will start if it’s her.


153 posted on 09/21/2020 9:42:42 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: karpov

This is why Ginsburg’s funeral, lying in state for multiple days and not being buried until next Friday is happening, contrary to Jewish practice. It gives the House time to put together and pass impeachment articles and also for the NY AG to issue an indictment at the state level.


154 posted on 09/21/2020 9:45:07 AM PDT by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: damper99

I read, on another thread, that she was being interred, today, at Arlington.


155 posted on 09/21/2020 9:46:13 AM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

POTUS often surprises us, with his timing.


156 posted on 09/21/2020 9:47:17 AM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

He would have been able to nominate sooner HOWEVER now with RBG not following Jewish tradition and being interned immediately he has to wait on the nomination!!!


157 posted on 09/21/2020 9:50:14 AM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

She is laying in repose at the SC for 2 days Wed.and Thur. VERY WEIRD for someone Jewish!!


158 posted on 09/21/2020 9:51:54 AM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat
Like another poster said....all to allow the Dems to try stupid stalling tricks. 🤬
159 posted on 09/21/2020 10:01:18 AM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

He can’t look cold hearted. But SCOTUS should schedule only ONE day not two.


160 posted on 09/21/2020 10:04:02 AM PDT by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-253 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson