Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aquila48

The idea that some two-bit Hitler governor or mayor can give himself absolute power by simply unilaterally declaring a state of emergency has to be the biggest con perpetrated on us.

Would you prefer a top-down one-size-fits-all approach from the FedGov? IMO Trump is right to delegate this to states and cities.We can demand a federal response or we can follow the Tenth Amendment and leave it up to the governors and mayors to decide on a policy that best meets state and local needs. What we cannot do is assign responsibility for containing the virus to the governors and mayors and then complain when they do just that.

16 posted on 09/16/2020 1:24:57 PM PDT by FormerFRLurker (Keep calm and vote your conscience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: FormerFRLurker

“Would you prefer a top-down one-size-fits-all approach from the FedGov?”

Is that the only other choice??

How about this instead.

A mayor, governor or president gets to unilaterally declare a state of emergency for a short period of time, say a week.

After that he has to get permission from the respective jurisdiction legislature to continue it for another agreed to period of time, which can be revisited by the legislature as things change.

The judiciary can also become involved as was done in this case.

I simply don’t like the idea of a single person solely on their own grabbing such unlimited powers.


17 posted on 09/16/2020 1:47:00 PM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you care! Guilting you is how they control you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson