Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bishop_Malachi

Ending the spoils system was a very good idea. Andrew Jackson put us on the path toward bigger government in his era and for that reason was not a good president.

The problem is that the end of the spoils system led to the creation of a bureaucracy of its own: the Civil Service Commission.

What the Founders set up is what we should have re-implemented, which was based on experience and talent. Instead of going with the already tried and true, the new way forward was a nebulous “qualifications”, or expertise.

This is a good rundown: (the first several paragraphs)

https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/american-government/the-bureaucracy/the-growth-of-the-federal-bureaucracy


4 posted on 09/04/2020 7:44:19 AM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (Public meetings are superior to newspapers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ProgressingAmerica

There’s no doubt that the Spoils System has it problems. There is a tradeoff either way.

I do take issue though with the argument that Jackson was a “Big Government” politician. Relatively speaking he’s innovations increased government no where near what many of his predecessors did. If expanding government makes one a “bad president”, then Lincoln, Roosevelt, and everyone from LBJ onward are bad presidents.


8 posted on 09/04/2020 7:53:43 AM PDT by Bishop_Malachi (Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson