makes sense, if they can’t confirm you ballot, and they can’t, then vote.
For me, I’ll be happy just to vote in person as I typically do.
My understanding of the system is that once your mail in ballot has been received and passed the review of the outer envelope for signature, ID/s if required and other requirements for that state then the voter’s name is flagged on the computer/sign in log showing that the ballot has been received and will be counted when the envelope is opened on election day for counting.
Thus, going to the polling site on election day and asking to vote allows you to verify if your ballot has been received and accepted for counting. If your name has not been flagged as having already submitted a valid ballot via mail then you would be allowed to vote in person.
This, essentially defeats the “ballot harvesting” “forged ballots” by the Dems by making the election day ballot dump useless. Once you have voted in person your name is stricken from the list of valid voters. If a mail in ballot arrives after you have voted in person that mail in ballot will be denied/disqualified.
Why do you think the Dems have been in court attempting to get the courts to declare that ballots received at the precinct after the close of voting on election day? They want to have the “harvested/forged” ballots accepted after closing of the precinct, but if you have shown up in person on election day and voted because your mail in ballot has not been accepted at the time of your arrival at the precinct then your in person vote will be counted and any mail in ballots arriving after that time will be rejected.
great move by the Trump team to counter the Dems attempted to cause chaos on and after the polls close.