[Mr Radical]

You need to take off those rose-tinted specs when watching the videos
"The guy was already contained and restrained and not resisting nor a threat at that point"
At no point was he contained or restrained until Chauvin put him on the ground
"There was no reason for Chauvin to be physically on him once he was already on the ground"
Chauvin was physically on him to make sure he stayed contained and restrained
"Furthermore, there was no police effort to resuscitate"
You obviously haven't watch all the video, only the bits that support your bias.

[Moonlighter]

I said he was restrained and contained "at that point" meaning once on the ground and told not to move, he did not struggle to get up. Shackles could've been used in leiu of that.

There was no reason to be on a non responsive person for 4 minutes. Please tell me where in this video they administered resuscitation? https://youtu.be/0gQYMBALDXc

The answer is they didn't. I'm not the one with rose colored glasses or bias between the two of us.