To: Heartlander
I'd like to see how they get rid of waste heat, and what sort of efficiency they claim.
It appears to be a better nuclear generator than any yet developed.
How do they claim to do that.
At least, they are not claiming to get something for nothing.
Overall, it fits the "Sounds too good to be true..." warning.
18 posted on
08/25/2020 6:55:59 AM PDT by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: marktwain
But if we shutdown and close all the commercial nuclear power plants in the world, where will the nuclear waste for these batteries come from ???
To: marktwain
Overall, it fits the “Sounds too good to be true...” warning.
That’s what I was thinking until I saw where it was getting its power from. And it doesn’t seem to be a battery as much as a tiny nuclear power generator that could power batteries, as it’s rate of discharge is pretty low. It’s believable to me because it is generating power via nuclear decay. i.e. it’s not a “perpetual motion machine”.
Many things we take for granted today were considered “too good to be true” at one time.
25 posted on
08/25/2020 6:59:48 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson