This question will never be asked by the Press. They are not looking for truth; they are complicit in subverting the United States of America. They will tell any lie, distort any truth, smear ANYONE— they will do ANYTHING that will help their cause.
there is no such a thing as a fossil fuel
The party of science, are they? They hardly care about the reality of biology.
If you can tell me which end of the snake is the DNC and which is the MSM, I’ll be sure to ask the right end.
YOU PUMPED IT OUT OF THE GROUND!!!
Joe, how many square feet of solar cells and of windmill blades will we need to replace carbon containing fuels?
I’m totally in favor of eliminating carbon fuel consumption inside the Washington Beltway.
And when will SOMEONE point out that there are just as many SCIENTISTS who agree with our point of view on everything? Whenever a Lefty says ‘I go with Science’ I want to puke. There are probably MORE scientists who disagree with the Dems, but don’t want to lose their jobs or be cancelled.
Up is down. Black is White, Right is wrong.
Every spring, one can drive up I-95 and see trees turning green around Richmond, bare trees around Fredericksburg and trees turning green as you speed towards DC.
The effect of CO2 production is mainly local.
Both the press and the “party of science” are almost totally illiterate when it comes to the REAL interactions that control things like climate, the effects of carbon dioxide on all other life processes, and the very real wealth that is created by conversion of these “fossil fuels” to useful energy on a huge and widespread scale.
But even greater than this selective and willful ignorance on fossil fuels, the unyielding resistance to the application of known principles of nuclear energy to produce plentiful and incredibly CHEAP electrical energy, through Thorium fueled Molten Salt reactors, which is of an entirely different order than older Uranium fueled Light Water reactors, is part and parcel of their drive to push the world back into pre-Industrial Revolution levels, before the harnessing of water power to run mills and looms caused an explosion of economic growth.
If they’re so scientific, ask them how is it humans can be anything other than male or female?
From the excerpt: “Sea levels have risen ... less than one foot, out of an average depth of around 30,000 feet.”
The most recent estimate of the average ocean depth, calculated in 2010, is 3.6km (12,080 feet), according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
If the writer can’t get such an elementary fact right, how reliable is the rest of the piece?