The question for the prosecutor would be: Do you go after ANY charitable agency that does the same practice? Would that include ones you contribute to? If not, why are you not under indictment, for using a position of trust to further political position rather than as an officer of the court to further justice?
DK
yes...
the corrupt judges will begin to see that they can no longer manipulate the law and keep their cushy jobs...
they will have to side with the law.
My first thought was why not go after the Clinton Foundation? Or the Obama Foundation? IF the Deep State is not willing to do it, then someone can go after them on the same basic charges in civil court. If embarrassment and harassment are their goals, then two can play that game.
“The question for the prosecutor would be: Do you go after ANY charitable agency that does the same practice? Would that include ones you contribute to? If not, why are you not under indictment, for using a position of trust to further political position rather than as an officer of the court to further justice?”
That question would be objected to and stricken as it is not relevant to the case. I keep hearing too many people say, “They (democrats) did it, too.” True...and...they should be brought into court to answer charges IF, they made promises that the administrators of the non-profit would be unpaid.