[rollo tomasi]

The lawyer speak you project is very boorish since there has not been contrary evidence examined yet by a neutral party. Beyond reasonable doubt has not been established yet. Fundamentals/reason/burden of proof which seems you are already for the execution phase. How come he is not been fined or jailed yet? Has he made any inclinations that stated he was not innocent yet? If you are a lawyer, you are of those types of creatures whose bones should lie in the deepest trenches of the ocean never to bother peaceful citizens again. You are a one-sided prejudicial tyrant that larps as prosecutor.

Have you read the briefs for the defense, interviewed their witnesses, have intimate knowledge of their strategies, cross-examined the evidence, etc...?

[Okeydoker]

Gee, I thought we were in the court of internet opinion, Not a court of law.

It’s funny watching all these law and order so called conservatives demanding no one form An opinion until all the evidence is presented in court! They never have failed to form opinions without evidence before.

I guess if it’s one of their political cronies all of a sudden there is never enough guilty evidence to convict.

[Not_Who_U_Think]

I’m not jumping in to defend Okeydoker, but from my very limited experience with financial crimes prosecution, it’s all on paper and they have it.

I’m sympathetic to the Build The Wall cause, and maybe there’s an explanation, but the docs point to statements made like, “every penny goes to the wall!” And that can get you in trouble.