This article is the worst I’ve ever read by Daniel Greenfield. He ALWAYS makes sense but he could be at the end of his rope like the rest of us. I couldn’t follow the mish/mash of names he inserted here and there without explanation of who or why. He talked about Connolly before introducing him to the story..And then there was this:
“”The Democrat politician was running to head San Diego””
How does a person “head” San Diego?
Deadlines are the curse of us all.
I lost the thread and couldn’t post everything that irritated me. I quit now as it’s just not worth my time being irritated. I am disappointed in Greenfield tho’.
Becerra would not have been in a position as Kamala’s SUCCESSOR to settle anything so he had to be the attorney on the case.
“”Wallace was accused of sexually harassing his assistant. Xavier Becerra, Kamala’s successor, settled for $400,000 with a non-disclosure agreement.””