Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/14/2020 3:04:20 PM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Twotone

“BLACK & BROWN FOLKS BUILT THIS COUNTRY (AND WE’RE DOING IT AGAIN) JOIN US OR GET OUT OF THE WAY!”

Hey asshole, the Mexicans will kill you when you’re done.


49 posted on 08/14/2020 4:42:01 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
I’m getting pretty sick of the, “we built this Country” BS.
50 posted on 08/14/2020 4:45:36 PM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Twotone
BLACK & BROWN FOLKS BUILT THIS COUNTRY (AND WE’RE DOING IT AGAIN) JOIN US OR GET OUT OF THE WAY!”.

Hmm, so if slavery "built this country" then one would think that the principal product of slavery, antelbellum cotton exports, would be an overwhelmingly large portion of the economy.

From the below chart, hardly so. Assuming that the bulk of cotton production represents the bulk of the slave-based economy and that the bulk thereof was exported, then we see a rough estimate of the slave-economy's portion of the GDP

MERCHANDISE IMPORTS, EXPORTS, AND TRADE BALANCE: 1790-2006 (billions of dollars)

Year Exports GDP Exports as % of GDP
1820 0.07 .07 10%
1830 0.07 1.01 6.9%
1840 0.12 1.55 7.7%
1850 0.14 2.56 5.4%
1860 0.33 4.32 7.6%

From: http://www.econdataus.com/trade06.html (for some reason the percentage of GDP chart at the bottom differs from the absolute numbers at the top, which I used to calculate GDP share -- I prefer the absolute numbers in order to see the GDP growth over each decade; also, 1860 is not the best year for comparison, as the coming turmoil was well launched, but I'm going with the round numbers here).

If someone has more specific numbers on slave-economy's portion of GDP over time, I'd love to see it. This is from a quick internet search (not going through Jstor, etc.). Regardless of the weakness of my reading of this data, it's clear that slave-plantation output, which was largely for export, constituted a narrow portion of the economy. Furthermore, the labor component of cotton production was likely a small portion of the commodity's value, even if slave labor were translated into wages.

Worse, when considering the well-documented condition that slavery inhibited economic growth, we might change this billboard to read, "Black and brown people hindered the building of this country."

58 posted on 08/14/2020 5:07:02 PM PDT by nicollo (I said no!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson