Chief District Judge Lynn dissented, and would reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment. Judge Lynn wrote that the majority opinion conflicted with this Circuit’s precedent in Fyock, and with decisions in all the six sister Circuits that addressed the Second Amendment issue presented here. Judge Lynn would hold that intermediate scrutiny applies, and Cal. Penal Code § 32310 satisfies that standard.
Look for an en banc panel to overturn this ruling.
That’s what I expect.
[[Look for an en banc panel to overturn this ruling. ]]
That’s my feeling- Seems like quite often when a court gives the President a win, some federal judge steps in and buts the ruling on hold, then the win gets overturned
But don’t you love how they rely on precedent? By that logic, Dred Scott would still be law. I have always thought that to be a BS standard - judges, even groups of them, are far from perfect. If they made mistakes X number of years ago, then precedent would argue against ever overturning those bad decisions.