Replies

She is not conceivably naturally an American when born with THREE nationalities.

The only way one is naturally a citizen is when one cannot be anything else.

ONE loyalty.
ONE allegiance.
ONE nationality.

THAT’S what the founders were requiring.

Thanks, for being consistent is appreciated by many.

Please keep posting this. Our citizens can’t afford to forget or overlook this.

Nobody cares about this stupid birther crap!

Whackjob conspiracy theories only make Trump look even more stupid, if he starts this birther crap again he’s toast, America is sick of hearing it.

Finally, no after-enacted constitutional provision addresses or modifies Article II’s requirement that a person must be a “natural born Citizen” to be eligible to be President. Nor has the Supreme Court decided a case regarding the meaning of the Natural Born Citizen Clause or whether any after-enacted amendments like the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause has altered the Article II conditions for presidential eligibility. Consequently, the original meaning of that provision when it was adopted between 1787 and 1789 remains an important and unanswered question of constitutional interpretation.

Conclusion
Article II of the U.S. Constitution requires a President to be a “natural born Citizen.” But, as the Supreme Court once observed: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that.”[415] The words appear not to have been used in any law in the United States for the past two centuries, and have not been used in any U.S. national law since 1790. To date, no one has offered a clear and persuasive account of the phrase’s original meaning. Original meanings are rarely ascertainable, but this case is a rare exception. The relevant historical evidence, which was exhaustively reviewed in this Article—Constitutional Convention debates, English common law, natural law, law of nations, canonical Anglo-American treatises like Blackstone’s and Kent’s, the 1784 Maryland Lafayette statute, the 1790 U.S. Naturalization Statute—all lead to the conclusion that the original meaning of “natural born Citizen” in Article II refers to a person either born in the United States, or outside it to a parent in government service or to a U.S. citizen father. This answer is faithful to then-universal natural law principles of jus soli and jus sanguinis, and to the material condition of the early United States as a new nation geographically distant from Europe but dependent on it for trade and commerce.

http://www.aulawreview.org/natural-born-citizen/

Now I say: of course the old founders view of the father determining natural born eligibility is sexist, we have to change that to mother and what a shock, Kamala's mother was not an American citizen either.