Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigtigermike

It’s an administrative penalty, it’s not incarceration.

That’s why he thinks he can do this.

His attorneys have certainly staffed it, and they think they can do this, even if it’s over the top.

Will provoke a legal debate on what a legal penalty is for administrative violations, which is a debate long overdue: only legislators should have the power to mandate penalties of any type, since they are accountable to the voters.

Garcetti is too, but he’s executive branch, not legislative.

Will be immediately stayed by a court order pending review after the first lawsuit.


46 posted on 08/06/2020 10:08:19 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Regulator

It’s an administrative penalty, it’s not incarceration.


Except that heat and water are lifebearing, both practically and in general, legally. It’s closer to making war than incarceration.


87 posted on 08/06/2020 12:50:40 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Regulator

yes, but an administrative action that is, in essence, confiscating wealth. That is, no water, no electric, triggers unsuitable habitat, which triggers homeowner’s insurance clauses, which destroys homeowner’s equity should there be a fire.

who has the power to arrest mayors? city? county? state? federal?


106 posted on 08/06/2020 6:53:58 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson