the Justice Department found that special counsel Robert Mueller's prosecutors had failed to turn over exculpatory evidence to Mr. FlynnIt found more than that. It found there was no crime. The facts did not support the charge. This isn't a mere procedural foul, a mere Brady violation. This is an assertion that even if the made up facts, even if the frameup was true, there is no crime.
Sullivan failed to find a necessary element of the crime. It's his fault as much as it is the corrupt Special Council.
Prosecutor's Motion to Dismiss - May 7, 2020
the Government has concluded that the interview of Mr. Flynn was untethered to, and unjustified by, the FBI's counterintelligence investigation into Mr. Flynn--a no longer justifiably predicated investigation that the FBI had, in the Bureau's own words, prepared to close because it had yielded an "absence of any derogatory information." Ex. 1 at 4, FBI FD-1057 "Closing Communication" Jan. 4, 2017 (emphases added). The Government is not persuaded that the January 24, 2017 interview was conducted with a legitimate investigative basis and therefore does not believe Mr. Flynn's statements were material even if untrue.
That excerpt is on the first page of the Motion to Dismiss. The FBI had no justification to interview Flynn. There was no underlying investigation, so no matter WHAT Flynn said, it could not affect an underlying investigation.
That is a much more fundamental problem than failing to turn over information that may support an exculpatory argument, such as bias. Even a biased witness can speak the truth.
The government should be prosecuting Strzok and Mueller for civil rights violations.
the Justice Department found that special counsel Robert Mueller’s prosecutors had failed to turn over exculpatory evidence to Mr. Flynn
It found more than that. It found there was no crime.
—
Let’s get to the real heart of the matter. There is only one crime; being a supporter of Pres. Trump.