[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

The government isn’t a party, no matter what. This is court vs. defendant. The government’s stake in this is government power to withdraw a charge. as far as the court is concerned, it HAS allowed the charge to be withdrawn. What Sullivan is not releasing is the defendant, and he is doing so by abuse of judicial power.

I think you are saying the en banc appeals court should rule in favor of Flynn, and I agree. But how many of them are Obama/Bush/Clinton deep staters?

[Cboldt]

-- I think you are saying the en banc appeals court should rule in favor of Flynn, and I agree. But how many of them are Obama/Bush/Clinton deep staters? --

The DC Circuit is majority political hacks. Everything in DC is majority DEM/left/marxist conclusions in strained constitutional rhetoric.

That it is even entertaining this, en banc, is a stain. Regardless of the outcome. The court is knowingly using punishment by process. It knows Sullivan is out of line, it knows Flynn should have been out from under the government frameup since end of May, but now two courts, Sullivan and the DC Circuit think it better to hold up.

No matter how it decides, the loser will be petitioning to SCOTUS. It knew this going in too, and is doing what it can to inflict maximum delay in resolution.

Punishment by process.