So, he isn't a policeman who is undercover? You made the analogy, not me.
You know who I think he is? I don't think he is a LARP. I think he is some sort of ex-spook or NSA staffer who has morphed into winking at Anon's twitter posts and who has been promising arrests and justice for nearly 3 years now, but instead, the Deep State just keeps getting more powerful and skates from any punishment. He is more cheerleader than spook now. He might as well be a PR director.
See how OPINIONS work? Where in your OPINION you see promises being made I, and possibly others, may see something else entirely (like simple rhetorical questions).
Opinions are not facts. Q made concrete assertions and statements that even he contradicted. He made concrete promises and assertions that never came to be. That isn't opinion. You can have an "OPINION" about that, but it doesn't change the facts.
But you, you want to FORCE people into believing promises were made based solely on your OPINION when there was no ACTUAL promise in your example.
No, I am just debating you and shooting holes in your positions. Quite easily.
You made the analogy, not me.
I made an analogy regarding disinformation/distraction, which was the topic at hand at the moment.
You're trying to turn it into something else.
I think he is...yada, yada, yada.
Thanks for sharing your opinion!
Q made concrete assertions and statements that even he contradicted. He made concrete promises and assertions that never came to be.
Again, thanks for sharing your OPINION.
Your conclusions, based on everything you've shown me so far, are only your OPINIONS.
No, I am just debating you and shooting holes in your positions. Quite easily.
Riiiight! Keep on telling yourself that.
Point of fact, you've never addressed my analogy, you've only tried to divert from it.
Curious, that.