Look up thee 1983 Supreme Court decision in Imbler v. Pachtman. Prosecutors were granted absolute immunity for anything connected to their job. And you wondered why Soros spent all that money on those DA elections.
The DA is not totally immune. The Duke LaCrosse case demonstrated that a prosecutor can be sent up for criminal wrongdoing in relation to a prosecution.
How many politicians and others in our government have taken money from him?
Aren't they compromised?
I will. But what I find interesting is, judges also enjoy that same immunity. They gave it to themselves. I would think that now that many states are looking to or have taken away qualified immunity from the cops, it’s time for legislatures to start looking at taking that away from the DAs.
I’m hoping that with all the things going on with Covid-19 that folks start really taking a look at what is happening at their local level. Stuff most don’t pay much attention to. They need to start looking at the dirty real estate deals, zoning decisions, tax incentives to get a “business” to move to their town, and most important of all.....what their school system and justice system is doing. Lots and lots of money being poured down that drain. Time for some accountability.
Interesting you mention Soros, as we all know he’s behind all of this. He helped get 3 radicals elected in Northern Virginia. Apparently, they are so radical that the Liberal Democrat Soft-On-Crime DAs that they replaced were warning voters about what they’re going to do. Much like the DA in Philly and the one in SanFran.