Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Charge Against St. Louis Couple for Defending their Home
AmmoLand ^ | 21 July, 2020 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 07/23/2020 5:41:54 AM PDT by marktwain

Kim Gardner, the radical St. Louis prosecutor, has asked for and obtained a warrant to seize the rifle and pistol used to defend a St. Louis couple's home, where hundreds of protesters trespassed and screamed at them on Sunday, 28 June, 2020.

It appears the charge used by far-left St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, to confiscate McClosky's firearms, is Missouri statute 571.030, Unlawful use of weapons. Bold added for emphasis:

*571.030. Unlawful use of weapons — exceptions — penalties. — 1. A person commits the offense of unlawful use of weapons, except as otherwise provided by sections 571.101 to 571.121, if he or she knowingly:

(1) Carries concealed upon or about his or her person a knife, a firearm, a blackjack or any other weapon readily capable of lethal use into any area where firearms are restricted under section 571.107; or

(2) Sets a spring gun; or

(3) Discharges or shoots a firearm into a dwelling house, a railroad train, boat, aircraft, or motor vehicle as defined in section 302.010, or any building or structure used for the assembling of people; or

(4) Exhibits, in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening manner; or

There are exceptions. Number 5 seems to apply.

5. Subdivisions (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), and (10) of subsection 1 of this section shall not apply to persons who are engaged in a lawful act of defense pursuant to section 563.031.


(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: banglist; defense; mccloskey; mo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: marktwain

So you’re a prosecutor who knows your case is toast for a dozen reasons and you face a strong possibility of litigation.

What would make you proceed?


41 posted on 07/23/2020 8:34:53 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten
In this case, however, after the mob had broken through the iron gate into private property, self-defense and fear of imminent bodily harm will overrule any brandishing charge.

Not if the prosecutor is a George Soros pick... the new 'law' is based on "if you're friends of the thugs in charge".

In short, criminals are being protected while threatened frightened citizens are being charged.

It's the commie way...

(soon to be 'the legal system' in every city if Biden's team can do enough fraud to get him 'elected'...

42 posted on 07/23/2020 8:42:31 AM PDT by GOPJ (Leo Terrell - Michael Shellenberger - Stephen Hsu - Bari Weiss - TRUTH: the new HATE SPEECH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

No prob. Still not sure what’s gonna happen


43 posted on 07/23/2020 8:44:22 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
I have a list of people who should pray that I die suddenly and unexpectedly rather than after having been told “you have three months to live”.

Me too. It will be messy.

44 posted on 07/23/2020 8:52:36 AM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

“We can all argue whether prosecution is justified; if this wasn’t an election year then I doubt charges would have been filed. But the way the law reads the evidence seems to be against the defendants.”

Not a surprising statement coming from a Troll such as yourself.


45 posted on 07/23/2020 1:14:08 PM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
It's been argued that accepting a pardon is the same as pleading guilty and they would never be able to own guns again convicted or not.

A pardon restores all civil rights of the convicted.

46 posted on 07/23/2020 1:43:02 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson