Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FLT-bird
Yes I would have people believe the truth. You are right about that.

Of course you do.

Each state is sovereign. It does not require a permission slip from anybody else to leave.

So you keep saying.

Dred Scott was later nullified. That does not mean it was correct at the time.

Correct? No, that is a matter of opinion at the time and is generally discredited now. Binding? It certainly was.

Same goes for Plessy v Ferguson.

Yes, but not in the manner you would have us believe. Bad decision in retrospect but still binding.

Texas V White is wrong and no more binding than either of those were before they were overturned.

Except that the other decisions were binding until overturned and the White decision is binding still.

125 posted on 07/22/2020 3:41:57 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
Of course you do.

I'm glad we straightened that out.

So you keep saying.

Because its the truth.Correct? No, that is a matter of opinion at the time and is generally discredited now. Binding? It certainly was.

Binding it may have been so long as force could be brought to bear to enforce it. Correct it never was - just like Texas V White.Yes, but not in the manner you would have us believe. Bad decision in retrospect but still binding.

No, in exactly the manner I highlighted. It was an incorrect illegitimate decision temporarily binding only so long as it could be backed by force.Except that the other decisions were binding until overturned and the White decision is binding still.

Don't worry. It won't stand. Nothing lasts forever.

130 posted on 07/22/2020 3:55:16 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson