Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she is being treated for recurrence of cancer
Washington Post via MSN ^ | July 17, 2020 | Robert Barnes

Posted on 07/17/2020 10:43:11 AM PDT by libstripper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: lexington minuteman 1775

I’d like a definition of “full stream.”


22 posted on 07/17/2020 11:12:40 AM PDT by Ouchthatonehurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: albie
So sad....but time for her to go.....get another Conservative soonest...no matter what.
23 posted on 07/17/2020 11:12:44 AM PDT by mastertex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mjp
who will die first, her or Maxwell?

What odds are you offering?

If it's a straight up bet, I'll take maxwell for a hundred, Alex.

The demonRATS will embalm rbg, shoot her full of botox, put wires in her body, and keep her moving until 11/04/2020.

24 posted on 07/17/2020 11:13:02 AM PDT by USS Alaska (NUKE THE MOOSELIMB, TERRORISTS, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Need More Baby Parts


25 posted on 07/17/2020 11:14:11 AM PDT by dsrtsage (Complexity is merely simplicity lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

She hasn’t worked in years, and is just a figurehead for democrat policies and decisions. Someone else is doing all the dirty work, while she just presents the results of that work. Even the questions she presents when cases are argued, have been pre-written for her, and her decisions are always for the democratic/liberal side. She’s just a body, where she and democrats want her propped-up until she draws her last breath.

All to deny Trump another sCOTUS pick, in the hopes that a democrat gets to do so if elected.


26 posted on 07/17/2020 11:14:48 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

If, (when) she croaks prior to the November elections just imagine the screeching from the Marxists about not appointing a replacement in an election year.


27 posted on 07/17/2020 11:14:51 AM PDT by Cuttnhorse (Nothing dies harder than a lie that people want to believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: malach
Not necessarily. Did you read the thread today about the 100 year old woman who is the state of CA’s longest duration employee, 77 years, and still works fulltime as a financial analyst? Some people retain their faculties into extreme old age and others don’t.

I did. The woman was healthy and did not have liver cancer.

What in the hell kind of comparison is that?

28 posted on 07/17/2020 11:16:14 AM PDT by USS Alaska (NUKE THE MOOSELIMB, TERRORISTS, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775
So Rush Limbaugh sometimes misses 3 to 5 days after he has a treatment for cancer. Rush is probably 20 years younger than Ruth Bader Ginsburg and yet she’s able to continue at Full Steam? I doubt that.

I listened to Rush today saying that his audience model shows that by the end of July will be up to 60,000,000 per day.

If that is accurate, the re-election of President Donald John Trump is guaranteed, at 100%.

The last election had Rush with about 25,000,000 to 27,000,000 listeners.

If that number is more than doubled, we win.

I don't know if that is accurate, but if it is, we win.

29 posted on 07/17/2020 11:23:28 AM PDT by USS Alaska (NUKE THE MOOSELIMB, TERRORISTS, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: USS Alaska

Remember the electoral college counts.


31 posted on 07/17/2020 11:42:02 AM PDT by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

“Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg announced Friday that she is being treated for a recurrence of cancer, this time on her liver”

JUST on her liver?

She DOESN’T say that.


32 posted on 07/17/2020 11:51:11 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

She is a recurrence of cancer upon the USofA!


33 posted on 07/17/2020 11:58:06 AM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouchthatonehurt
"I’d like a definition of “full stream.”"


Doesn't that mean Full of (fish-)5h!t?
34 posted on 07/17/2020 2:33:06 PM PDT by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gcparent

I have an interesting take on the electoral college. What if President Trump actually wins the total majority of votes in the US in November? Would that mean that all the liberal states who changed their rules to allow their electoral votes to follow the majority would have to also vote for the President? If so he could win by a landslide and they would be forced to cast all their electoral votes for him.


35 posted on 07/17/2020 7:09:04 PM PDT by Desparado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson