To: Triple
The author misrepresents at least one of the studies he cites.
“Meta-analysis of observational studies provided evidence of a protective effect of masks (OR = 0.13; 95% CI: 0.03–0.62) and respirators (OR = 0.12; 95% CI: 0.06–0.26) against severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).”
13 posted on
07/16/2020 7:00:46 PM PDT by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: NobleFree
Wow - nice attention to detail. I did not catch that at all...
There is some evidence of mask effectiveness vs SARS. Is that right?
18 posted on
07/16/2020 7:06:48 PM PDT by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: NobleFree
I'm not sure what you think that math means. To me, it simply means that surgical masks and N95 respirators perform almost exactly the same, neither work.
105 posted on
07/16/2020 9:14:56 PM PDT by
Grandpa Drudge
(Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my grandchildren.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson