[taxcontrol]

No the full court does not have to and normally wont take up a review. Exceptions exist though they are mostly in cases where the precedent or constitutionality is either undetermined or a lot closer to 50/50. In this case, I predict that the full court will NOT take up the case as the ruling follows existing precident.

[tet68]

the ruling follows existing precident.

That used to be the case, today’s courts who knows?

[Pox]

Normally, your prediction would be correct.

However, the circuit court is filled with liberal activists who will likely be more than happy to go En Banc, you know, for the cause!

As was postulated, this creep has likely already canvassed the rest of that circuit courts members and already knows what the result will be, which is they will be happy to rehear the case.

[Signalman]

If the full court declines, can he STILL delay it. When does this sh*t end?

[Repealthe17thAmendment]

You have to wonder why the court would want to take up a case that is certain to be ultimately dismissed; either at the district level, or if appealed, to the supreme court. It's a loser no matter how you look at it.

All common sense would say that the full court would pass, but crazy things have happened in this case.

[EQAndyBuzz]

” In this case, I predict that the full court will NOT take up the case as the ruling follows existing precedent.”

They will wait till after summer and then agree to take it up.