[DoodleDawg]

Nope,not intentional.Negligence,by its very definition,cannot be intentional.

Criminal negligence is defined as "...conduct in which a person ignores a known or obvious risk, or disregards the life and safety of others." If you ignore something then that's intentional.

[Gay State Conservative]

No,not "criminal negligence"...*negligence*.You see I'm a huge supporter of jury nullification *in some situations*.In a case like this I,a juror,wouldn't give a rat's hindquarters what "instructions" the judge might give before we start deliberations.*I* would decide what constitutes negligence...criminal or otherwise...not some damn judge.

Google "jury nullification" if you wish...there's a lot of interesting stuff on it out there.Some of it goes back to the 1700s.