Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrChips

This is an interesting (if lefty biased) discussion on problems with polling:

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/why-2016-election-polls-missed-their-mark/

They are basically admitting that voodoo is more scientific than polling.


24 posted on 07/08/2020 10:16:36 AM PDT by cgbg (Masters don't want slaves talking about masters and slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: cgbg
Voodoo probably is more scientific. But, but look inside this poll. One major flaw here: this was an automated poll and it did not include the millions upon millions of people who have cell phones. It also does not tell you what specific breakdown, especially by party affiliation, was used. But, setting all of that aside, consider the fact that this poll shows a 10% gap but only 6% undecided. The methodology does not explain where the other 4% went. I seriously doubt that Kanye West has locked up that many votes. Does the Libertarian party even have a candidate? Let’s reduce that 4% to 1%, giving them some benefit of the doubt, and add 3% to the 6% undecided. Then, let’s assume President Trump gathers in 2/3 of that undecided vote. That puts the race at Biden 53%, Trump 46%. That means a flip of only 3.5% for Trump to win. And we’re talking popular vote, not electoral vote, which should come more easily. As we say down here in the south, “Hold on to the huckleberry bushes!“ Keep the faith.
73 posted on 07/08/2020 10:43:52 AM PDT by MrChips ("To wisdom belongs the apprehension of eternal things." - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson