Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: G Larry

according to the article BLM had paid for a permit to place that one the street. ... Hate to say it, but these citizens messed up.


11 posted on 07/08/2020 6:32:55 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: TexasFreeper2009

They can be charged with vandalism, provided the liberal vandals are also charged. Hate crime? Not hardly! And dollars to donuts no liberal vandal in the county has even been investigated!


22 posted on 07/08/2020 6:48:32 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Irrelevant.

I’m sure all the statues and monuments were properly permitted as well, yet they are defaced almost completely with out any consequence, (at the state level anyway).

And certainly no one is being charged with a “Hate Crime” for it.


30 posted on 07/08/2020 7:05:31 AM PDT by Jotmo (Whoever said, "The pen is mightier than the sword." has clearly never been stabbed to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009

according to the article BLM had paid for a permit to place that one the street. ... Hate to say it, but these citizens messed up.


If I were purchasing the home defaced by the hideous political statement in the street, I would see a threat to my property values. I would argue I was denied my rights for public comment before the BLM message was approved. For all the residents know, the painted street may be meant to identify them for further harassment by unrestrained rioters at some future date.


35 posted on 07/08/2020 7:35:10 AM PDT by RideForever (We were born to be tested)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Yes, they should have paid for a permit to paint their own message on the street. IF they were denied, they should have sued the city for violation of their 1st amendment rights.

The city has now established that the streets are legal places for political messages, so I think trump supports can paint ‘MAGA’ with a permit.


37 posted on 07/08/2020 8:02:07 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009
… according to the article BLM had paid for a permit to place that one the street. ... Hate to say it, but these citizens messed up.

This may be true .......but to charge these people with a "hate crime" jumps the shark. It is not only ridiculous, but it demonstrates how hateful and racist many black officials are.

After decades of “hate-whitey” indoctrination - racism and hatred is what directs so-called progressive black AGs, judges and other officials. Sullivan comes to mind as the poster child for these types of officials.

Let no good deed go unpunished. 600,000 Union soldiers dead or wounded is not enough! Trillions of dollars spent on poverty payments is not enough! Federal programs specific to black schools and black enterprises is not enough! The fact is that white hatred and distrust is so engrained in black culture that seemingly no act or benefit will satisfy them short of displacing all white people.

39 posted on 07/08/2020 8:45:20 AM PDT by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson