Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ballplayer

I still believe there is an understanding between the US and Russia that Russia would be on our side if it came to blows.


36 posted on 07/06/2020 10:50:24 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

...Russia would be on our side if it came to blows.
_______________________________________________________

Russia has its own problems (and a long border) w/China. They will always take their own side & Trump expects that. The trick is to show them our side is also theirs.


41 posted on 07/06/2020 11:00:28 AM PDT by reformedliberal (Make yourself less available.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

Don’t depend on it. Russia and China have on thing in common — they are both commies. Don’t ever,ever trust commies.


53 posted on 07/06/2020 12:09:38 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator; ballplayer
"I still believe there is an understanding between the US and Russia that Russia would be on our side if it came to blows."

It would makes sense, especially in this sense:

Both Russia && the U.S. would want to prevent China from taking over Siberia. In exchange for siding with the Russians against the Chinese, the U.S. should be given resource development rights, leased for a certain period of time anyway.

Why China Will Reclaim Siberia
Updated January 13, 2015, 11:54 AM

...

, justifying a Chinese takeover of Siberia. Of course, Russia's Asian hinterland isn't really empty (and neither was Palestine). But Siberia is as resource-rich and people-poor as China is the opposite. The weight of that logic scares the Kremlin.

Moscow recently restored the Imperial Arch in the Far Eastern frontier town of Blagoveshchensk, declaring: “The earth along the Amur was, is and always will be Russian.” But Russia's title to all of the land is only about 150 years old. And the sprawl of highrises in Heihe, the Chinese boomtown on the south bank of the Amur, right across from Blagoveshchensk, casts doubt on the “always will be” part of the old czarist slogan.

...

The border, all 2,738 miles of it, is the legacy of the Convention of Peking of 1860 and other unequal pacts between a strong, expanding Russia and a weakened China after the Second Opium War.

The 1.35 billion Chinese people south of the border outnumber Russia's 144 million almost 10 to 1. The discrepancy is even starker for Siberia on its own, home to barely 38 million people, and especially the border area, where only 6 million Russians face over 90 million Chinese. With intermarriage, trade and investment across that border, Siberians have realized that, for better or for worse, Beijing is a lot closer than Moscow.

The vast expanses of Siberia would provide not just room for China's huddled masses, now squeezed into the coastal half of their country by the mountains and deserts of western China. The land is already providing China, “the factory of the world,” with much of its raw materials, especially oil, gas and timber. Increasingly, Chinese-owned factories in Siberia churn out finished goods, as if the region already were a part of the Middle Kingdom's economy.


https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/07/03/where-do-borders-need-to-be-redrawn/why-china-will-reclaim-siberia
86 posted on 07/07/2020 3:39:14 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson