Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: G Larry
With 2 officers, one of them should have had his gun drawn.

If I'm reading the story right they were not aware that the suspect was armed until he pulled the gun so it makes sense that they would try non-lethal force first. I don't know enough about police work to know if a mistake was made on either officer's part but it sounds like he followed procedure. Criticizing him for using non-lethal measure first doesn't seem to be called for.

34 posted on 07/05/2020 10:23:50 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
Of course they didn't know he was armed.

Which is why, with 2 of them there, they should have been prepared to escalate with the first officer using non-lethal force.

35 posted on 07/05/2020 10:40:57 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no merit in compromising with the Devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

After backup arrives, and not until then, the officer should give a clear warning that “Due to the frequent shooting of police officers in traffic stops deadly force may result from any misbehavior by the suspect”. He should only try to physically approach or handle the suspect when his backup is zeroed in on the target.

If the suspect is cooperative and the violation is minor, the officer should offer an apology and explanation that since many officers have been shot, policy dictates that they must proceed with great caution.


37 posted on 07/05/2020 10:58:14 AM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson