Her stats are intentionally misleading. She is calculating the CFR which even the CDC has said is not a real measurement of what is going on but she clings to this and then tells of a model that is wrong. But you get it.
Get it and get it over with. The kids in Alabama are smart.
I met up yesterday with a coworker who is half my age. He was sitting in his car with a mask and gloves.
I told him he didn’t need all that stuff and he gave me the standard “it’s to protect you” line as he handed me some stuff with his “contaminated” gloves
Yet the CDC posts stats just like the ones I calculate daily on their website. So does Johns Hopkins. And the WHO uses exactly the same calculation that I do to come up with their death rates. There is a reason they aren't adding positive serology results to those stats. They know--at least the people doing the work know--that antibodies can't differentiate between different strains of a virus--sometimes, they can't even differentiate between closely related virus species). Because I am a scientist, I will *never* pad data with highly questionable numbers just because the padded data supports a certain political narrative.
It actually makes me sick that so-called conservatives (like yourself) have decided that pushing a narrative is better than sticking with the truth. I expect such duplicity with leftists, not conservatives.