Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

I’m on your side on this. Totally agree.

The ones I am concerned for are the sons who have to put up with the social engineering programs and fill the gaps to get the mission done and then get shit on in advancement because of quotas and virtue signaling.


77 posted on 07/01/2020 1:33:41 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (We are governed by the consent of the governed and we are fools for allowing it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Sequoyah101
I’m on your side on this. Totally agree. The ones I am concerned for are the sons who have to put up with the social engineering programs and fill the gaps to get the mission done and then get shit on in advancement because of quotas and virtue signaling.

Thank you. I was perhaps a little rough in making my point, but the point is valid none the less.

I have knowledge of this sort of thing beyond what we see in this particular story. There have been plenty of examples where men had to pick up the slack to carry the women assigned to them. They don't dare complain about it, but it has happened quite a lot.

The military should not be a social program, or an "experiment." We now have enough data to make accurate decisions on the matter, and the data says it's a bad idea to mix men and women in combat forces.

93 posted on 07/01/2020 1:58:31 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson