The more I read about this case, the more confused I get. I completely support the couple for standing in front of their home, with guns at the ready.
Buat I’m struggling with the woman’s behavior. She evidently pointed her gun at one one the protesters. From what I’ve read, the protester was not on her personal property, but on a private street. So maybe the couple co-owned the street. And the protester was evidently yelling threats at the woman.
Would a jury accept that the woman was in fear for her life? I guess it all boils down to how far apart the protester was from the woman, and if the protester was armed in any way. If I were on that jury, I’d vote ‘not guilty’ regardless. I just don’t like those filthy protesters.
Personally, I don’t think they should have been charged in the first place. But it looks like that the DA is a liberal type. So even if they get off, it’s going to cost them a few bucks.
If this goes to trial, the lady’s innocence May depend on where the trial is held
The interview is pretty good and explains most everything, the mob was on their private property, having broken the gate,and were only yards from the house.
There are pics of one of the protestors pointing a gun at them. In addition, they told them you are next!
The homeowners did nothing wrong.