Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62

“The plane was safe to fly before.”

No, it wasn’t. It had a serious software defect that could point the nose down. It is why they corrected that defect.


34 posted on 06/28/2020 3:24:30 PM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad

The poorly written code and the undocumented features were only part of the problems found with the MAX. But as long as execs get their bonuses, who cares what happens later.


37 posted on 06/28/2020 3:40:04 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

The 737 Max was safer than driving a car per passenger mile traveled, especially in the United States. A safe plane is being made safer, but Boeing will now have to design their aircraft like Airbus does to be flown by unsafe pilots.

Neither flight crew should have allowed their planes to crash. They were low quality pilots flying in perfect daylight weather.

Holding the trim wheel, using the electric trim on the yoke, keeping the throttles set correctly, disabling automatic trim, or keeping the flaps extended while the stick shaker was activated: any of the previous would have prevented the crashes.


39 posted on 06/28/2020 3:44:25 PM PDT by Moonman62 (http://www.freerepublic.com/~moonman62/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson