Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: where's_the_Outrage?

How can a judge try a case with no accuser? The DOJ withdrew it’s accusation. Judge Emmett Sullivan has decided he is going to continue to push forward with the case, even though he has no case and no accuser. He sure sounds like a dyed in the wool democrat, doesn’t he?


15 posted on 06/26/2020 2:01:40 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: maxwellsmart_agent

If I remember correctly, in Jan or Feb Flynn filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea which Sullivan has not yet ruled on. Why? Most likely in order to drag the case out closer to the election so the headlines would say “Flynn sentenced to 3 years”.

The order by Sullivan for Flynn to stop filing motions that included newly released exculpatory evidence piecemeal, but instead to wait until the DOJ completed releasing newly discovered evidence was another way to avoid being forced to grant the motion to withdraw the guilty plea.

This has always been an exercise to slow down Flynn’s sentencing until close to the election. Even his court date for 16 July was for that reason. Once the Amicus files his report/brief he will then ask for counter briefs by Flynn. Then the Amicus will ask for interviews/depositions from select DOJ members of the former prosecution team. A fight over that will ensue with more delays for briefs to be filed.

This will go on for months and then, right before November, Sullivan will sentence Flynn to a long prison term. 24/7 news coverage and slandering of PDJT as having tried to interfere with “justice being served”.

My opinion.


42 posted on 06/28/2020 1:11:06 AM PDT by usnavy_cop_retired (Retiree in the P.I. living as a legal immigrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson