But they cannot deny the obvious. Trump is headed for a massive calamity in the election, as the (more accurate than 2016) polls show.
Yeah - NO.
we’re going to capitulate to a demented racist leading a party of insurrectionists that want to destroy America?
BS.
Sell your crazy somewhere else
Bullcrap.
Hillary was leading Trump by 11 points in June 2016, according to the super-biased media. How did that work out?
Obama’s approval rating in June 2008 was 44%. President Trump’s is now 47%. Obama won easily with an approval rating lower than Trump’s.
Seriously, you believe this drek?
The WSJ are never trumpers. They want to go back to pre 2016 policies and don’t give a crap about American families or workers.
“more accurate than 2016”
What makes you believe that?
“Trump is headed for a massive calamity in the election, as the (more accurate than 2016) polls show.”
“more accurate than the 2016 polls”
I think everyone would like to know exactly how you know that.
ROFL.
Which solar system are you posting from?
Exactly four years ago, to the day, 06/26/2016, hildabutchbitch led candidate Donald J. Trump by 12 points on the Real Clear Politics Average.
Every one knows that RCP is 100% accurate, and never makes a mistake.
Today, sleepy joe is ahead by 9.5 on the 100% accurate, Real Clear Politics Average.
If history is any guide, Trump is 2.5 points ahead of where he was in 2016.
BTW, what makes you think that today's polls are (more accurate than 2016)? Hmmmm?
WSJ are never
trumpers and globalist .
They are. the chamber of crony capitalist pals .
What are you referring too ?
They snapped when he killed the TPA treason bill and Global warming scam .
They hate he had not sold us out to China .
Your WSJ hasnt existed since the Murdocks seized power .
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You are full of it.
The WSJ editorial board has NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER been supportive of Trump.
Kimberley Strassel alone has been mostly supportive, and brilliantly so. But the rest of the editorial page crew are total and dedicated NeverTrumpers.
Give me a FREAKING break with that crap.
“Before anyone accuses the WSJ editorial board of just another bunch of globalists, let me remind you that this board, led by Paul Gigot, has been a staunch defender of Trump and Trumpism, and despises Democrats.”
absolutely not true; i’ve seen NUMEROUS anti-trump editorials come out of the WSJ ...
Your posting history shows that you are a never-Trumper and a concern troll. You hate the president but you are too much of a coward to state where you stand here on this forum.
Paul Gigot is one of the few shows I’ll watch on the weekends.
You must have your “Republics” confused? This is not the New Republic. Peddle that crap over there!
You’re delusional. Look an any headline and you can see the antiiTrump slant. Especially that b!tch Rebecca Ballhaus - a true trump hater who graces the front page weekly with her bile.
As far as the editorial board, really not much better. Please stop wetting yourself over these BS polls. As JB would say - c’mon man!
We all knew it was going to be something catastrophic in an election year. My money in Vegas was on a porn star.
You have to give the left wing credit for originality. Shutting down the economy and riots? Nobody would’ve thought of that.
May I suggest you invest in a new “Fainting Couch” and some new pearls to clutch..... and some smelling salts for after the election....
Are you serious? Biden is going to win? If that dementia ridden nit wit doesn’t have a stroke between now and November it’ll be a miracle.