Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: janetjanet998; circlecity; gogeo; Alberta's Child
Sullivan is not a party to the case, but he is a party to the request for a writ of mandamus. He can appeal to SCOTUS if he wants.

Case in 1957 essentially was in the same posture -- parties in a case were ticked at the judge for forcing them to a magistrate without their consent. They filed a writ of mandamus with the court of appeals, which granted it. The judge then filed his own appeal of the writ with SCOTUS, which heard the case on the merits rather than dismissing for lack of standing.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/352/249/

30 posted on 06/24/2020 9:02:40 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bruce Campbells Chin

I’ll take your word for it. Will we be paying the freight on both sides?


31 posted on 06/24/2020 9:58:10 AM PDT by gogeo (It isn't just time to open America up again: It's time to be America again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson