Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump Confirms: We’ll Re-Cancel DACA ‘Shortly’
Breitbart ^ | June 19 2020 | NEIL MUNRO

Posted on 06/19/2020 12:16:56 PM PDT by knighthawk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: MachIV

If the supreme court rules that all whites must off themselves in the next 24 hours, must all whites comply?

Only if they identify as white. You see the SCROTUS boxed themselves in a corner. I may be white on the outside but I am filled with black on the inside and it is against the law to tell me I am wrong. I am also a gazillion sexual. No one can deny me my right.

I can be anything and everything I want and the SCROTUS says that it is okay AND I get free healthcare.


21 posted on 06/19/2020 4:13:33 PM PDT by Dacula
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
What if everyone ignored all court rulings they thought were "bad"?

What if hey are bad, which this decision is? Someone needs to stop this judicial activism problem is Trump should have that first Judge that interfered in immigration with out any authority. Lawyer types here screamed that he had to obey the judge, he doesn't, maybe if the Supremes get involved he would be wise to listen but he doesn't have to.

The The Judicial Branch are unelected tyrants at present and if the President doesn't stop them who will?

22 posted on 06/19/2020 5:30:12 PM PDT by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

The silver lining is that most commentators fear that the decision makes it harder for a President to undo a prior President’s executive order.

That means... Humm... Hey wait a minute!...Buahaha (evil laugh)

Yes.. yes.. President Trump, get those executive orders lined up! Use the power you have been given :)

Just cranck them up.. and on the last day of your presidency (four years from now) sign a bunch more for good measure as a parting present.


23 posted on 06/20/2020 8:50:53 AM PDT by Toughluck_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
What if hey are bad, which this decision is? Someone needs to stop this judicial activism problem

Many judicial decisions are bad-- I know, I'm a lawyer and I see bad decisions often. But the problem is that everyone who loses a court case thinks the decision is "bad." If that were the criterion for ignoring a court decision, we would have anarchy.

Many liberals thought Bush v. Gore was "judicial activism." What if Bill Clinton had announced that that decision was wrong, and he was going to order that Al Gore be sworn in as the next President? We would have had a civil war.

Someone has to have the final say, and it's either going to be the President or the Supreme Court.

24 posted on 06/21/2020 2:48:56 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson