It's now mandatory for everyone
Posted on 06/19/2020 7:40:56 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The DOJ doesn’t want to prosecute Michael Flynn, but the judge does and that little railroad job is going forward.
The Supreme Court just created settled law over a bogus case that had nothing to do with the law that just got settled.
Our justice system is a dumpster fire.
white, christian, straight & male seem to be the only designations now without extra protections from discrimination.....
The same way a trumped up case brought about Roe v. Wade. The issue is never the issue, the issue is always the revolution.
“Sooner or later this is all going to come out”? For the MSM, the truth will stay in the closet forever.
And an asumption6of undefined guilt.
It's now mandatory for everyone
This information would have been a lot more useful LAST WEEK, you lawyers!
Just like Roe v. Wade, built on a lie.
“Sooner or later, this is all going to come out.”
Silly man still thinks the truth matters.
L
“It’s not a justice system but a legal system. Big difference.”
Thanks for making a point I usually state in these threads. We have one hell of a legal system that ensures certain outcomes. When those outcomes swerve into actual justice, it’s not because that was a stated goal. Mere happenstance...
The issue is never the issue, the issue is always The Revolution.
Watch for this- active participants who both want the same side of a decision, who are supported by big $$$ and who both want the same outcome- they will litigate and appeal until they get the desired outcome.
Another courtroom plan is 'repeal' to a new (3rd) position. The word Repeal used to mean you go back to what it was... the new 'repeal' by a court send it to a whole new position.
This is how they got gay marriage. Pass a law so badly worded, that it needs to be repealed. Then go to the OPPOSITE.
They used to only provide marriage certificates to a man and woman. So they passed a law saying this was now LEGALLY defined that way- you could ONLY give marriage licenses to a man and a woman. Then you get that 'repealed' and say "Oh, the opposite must be true- you MUST give marriage licenses to anyone"
That is the intent. By weakening a free society that replaced its population where members competed and produced wealth, a minority of people are able to parasitically siphon off its remainong wealth through tight legal controls.
So I guess the best course of action would have been to just let the fag keep stealing money?
According to the Supreme Court decision, Bostock was fired for conduct “unbecoming” a county employee. Not for fraud or misuse of funds. If Bostock’s sexual orientation did not play into the decision to fire him then his employer or its legal representatives did a terrible job of proving that.
If a worker is homosexual, black or a member of any other “protected” class, the employer had better have total documentation of the cause for firing.
According to this article, the matter in question has yet to be adjudicated. The suit was dismissed prior to a finding of fact on whether the firing was legal or not because the circuit court determined that Title VII did not cover sexual orientation.
Blaming someone for doing a bad job when the job was never needed according to the presiding court is a circular argument without beginning or end.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.