Under current defamation law, it's almost impossible to sue over statements of "opinion," so libel defendants usually rely on that defense.
To: Lurking Libertarian
Hey, it worked for Rachel Maddow.
2 posted on
06/18/2020 2:01:04 PM PDT by
A_perfect_lady
(The greatest wealth is to live content with little. -Plato)
To: Lurking Libertarian
Can’t Tucker declare he is a Google and be immune from lawsuits?
3 posted on
06/18/2020 2:04:07 PM PDT by
2banana
(Common ground with islamic terrorists-they want to die for allah and we want to arrange the meeting)
To: Lurking Libertarian
Tucker does not belong to Fox News news division. If he did, he would not be allowed to say what he says. He would have to be like the Ed and Sandra morning gig and be a Trump hater.
To: Lurking Libertarian
Problem is regular news no longer does sober factual reporting, as opinion has crept into everything they do, so a real opinion show today looks/appears more like a news show.
Its not that opinion shows have changed, its the news shows that have changed and look closer to opinion shows.
7 posted on
06/18/2020 2:10:38 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Lurking Libertarian
Another scorned woman. I glad I’m not rich.
8 posted on
06/18/2020 2:32:55 PM PDT by
oldbrowser
(The government did not create the people. The people created the government)
To: Lurking Libertarian
Atractive but something is clearly not right behind those eyeballs.
9 posted on
06/18/2020 2:37:54 PM PDT by
moehoward
To: Lurking Libertarian
Interesting tactic. I gave up the msm 5 years ago. But I watched Tucker all last week on YT)
10 posted on
06/18/2020 2:38:13 PM PDT by
HollyB
To: Lurking Libertarian
And Tucker regularly states plainly that his show is opinion, not news. He makes no claims to be a “news caster,” unlike Don LaMon.
Mark
13 posted on
06/18/2020 5:45:57 PM PDT by
MarkL
(Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson