With a charge of gross misrepresentation you certainly should be able to explain your claim. It escapes me.
An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what Title VII forbids.
What the article falsely alleges:
six Supreme Court justices just decided that what the Southern racist really meant by “sex” was gay and transgender [...] The Gorsuch decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia find[s] that “sex” in Title VII covers any group having anything to do with sex